University Autonomy and Academic Freedom: A Commitment to Truth
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Higher Education Administration and Accountability the Necessity of Autonomy and Academic Freedom from Faculties’ Viewpoint
Introduction: Originality and dynamism of university activities calls for a democratic atmosphere and considered as a supporting principles for faculties. Giving autonomy to universities is a fundamental policy to enhance their responsibility, accountability, and dynamism. Hence, this study is an endeavor to investigate the autonomy and academic freedom situation in university from the viewpoin...
متن کاملAutonomy and Manipulated Freedom
In recent years, compatibilism has been the target of two powerful challenges. According to the consequence argument, if everything we do and think is a consequence of factors beyond our control (past events and the laws of nature), and the consequences of what is beyond our control are themselves beyond our control, then no one has control over what they do or think and no one is responsible f...
متن کاملTruth and Freedom
If there is a man, the statement whereby we say that there is a man is true, and reciprocally—since if the statement whereby we say that there is a man is true, there is a man. And whereas the true statement is in no way the cause of the actual thing’s existence, the actual thing does seem in some way the cause of the statement’s being true: it is because the actual thing exists or does not tha...
متن کاملCollaboration – a Threat to Academic Autonomy?
Universities have historically encouraged individual academics with research expertise in a discrete area of study to undertake research and teaching in their discipline. In this process academics have had full autonomy, from the discovery of knowledge, the method used to integrate and interpret it, and the means used to convey it to students and to assess student learning. In recent times pres...
متن کاملEvidence Games: Truth and Commitment
An evidence game is a strategic disclosure game in which an agent who has different pieces of verifiable evidence decides which ones to disclose and which ones to conceal, and a principal chooses an action (a “reward”). The agent’s preference is the same regardless of his information (his “type”)—he always prefers the reward to be as high as possible—whereas the principal prefers the reward to ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SCHOLARS: Journal of Arts & Humanities
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2773-7837,2773-7829
DOI: 10.3126/sjah.v1i0.34443